Tuesday, October 4, 2011

"The 'Banking' Concept of Education"

     In Freire's essay, he discusses a great deal how modern education is a one way street. It is an "act of depositing." Teachers give their students some dosage of facts and the students are only required to regurgitate this information on some sort of examination. Friere sees this as a negative; however, I see it as a necessary evil. Yes school does only provide fact and does not stimulate thinking to some extent. However, in order to discuss or think about concepts, a student needs a certain foundation on which to begin discussing. A discussion between a proponent of socialized healthcare and someone who is indifferent and is not even aware that health care can be socialized is not a very interesting discussion. Free thinking and discussion is promoted within the classroom in several courses--such as this one--; however, in most courses, discussion occurs outside the classroom. Even after an individual is knowledgeable in a certain topic through lecture, the learning process has not stopped there. Now that person can share his perspective on socialized healthcare, for instance, with someone who disagrees with him or her. Through such a debate, it is almost certain that he or she will learn a new aspect of the topic from that other person. Therefore, one way learning in the classroom, although very static, is required.

1 comment:

  1. agreed. Is it not true that in order to teach this class I frequently have to use "material" from other disciplines (journalism, politics, literature, philosophy). You are correct that we do need to be informed about topics in order to discuss them. However, we also need to know how to critique that very information. Could you imagine if I merely took Fox News or alternately John Stewart as THE authority on today's political issues? The authority/facts need to be confronted, but confronted and interpreted critically.

    ReplyDelete